←
Whitfield — Bad faith demand
Coverage LitigationCoverage Disputes · 3bad faithextra-contractualChapter 542
Status
Due date
Add due date
Assignees
SNSela NdiayeCBChristian Brown
71 days to a coverage decision against a 60-day clock — resolve on the timeline.
Documents
2Conversations
1Notes & Checklists
1Tasks
0/2Review Matrix
1Drafts
1Claim file2 tasks open on this claim · every section cites its source
Alton Whitfield reported this loss on 12 Sep 2025, following a loss date of 8 Sep 2025. Extra-contractual demand asserting delayed payment and inadequate investigation on a 2025 property loss. Response due within the statutory window. Policy — under Coverage Litigation, handled in Bexar County, TX. Current status is escalated; the reserve stands at $250,000.
Drawn from
No coverage issue stated yetlow confidence
Position: Under review
Turns on —.
Resolves itA coverage position is written once the inspection and statement are in.
Drawn from
Complete the inspection and the recorded statement, then take a coverage position.
Draft the next status letterDrawn from
Scoped to Whitfield — Bad faith demand — every document, chat, note and task on it.
Does the seepage exclusion apply to this loss?
No repeated seepage question sits on Whitfield — Bad faith demand. The exclusion at § I.B.13 is only in play where the file shows moisture over weeks or months, and nothing in this claim's documents does.
Continue the conversation…
